I was going to use kinesthesia but went with proprioception instead.
Just to share everyone good discussion to read different perspectives!I think we teach in different worlds, for you it is probably the rarified air of Division 1 or at least college bound pitchers. I have to first teach IR to every girl who comes to me for lessons. Worse, if they have seen another pitching 'instructor' I have to wean them away from HE. When they finally get to where they can reliably use IR (months) most them have a 'cut' fastball, a mix of top and bullet. That seems like the natural spin for most of them. At this point we are still refining mechanics, working on velocity and consistency. After introducing the change up, which is usually a disaster, I move on to top spin, or should I say the drop. At this point they will contort their delivery in an attempt to get 6-12. Some of them have natural top spin and if I try to get them to add additional RPM it often causes issues. For the girls who have been with me for a couple of years it's a different story. They have the knowledge and proprioception to be able to refine their delivery and spin the ball in different ways.
You seem to think that a pitch that doesn't move is bad. I believe that pitcher needs pitches that do different things. If all they have is a 6-12 fastball and a change up they are predictable and a flat fastball up in the zone might be useful. And we have all seen plenty of bullet spin riseballs.
You also have to keep in mind how the brain naturally computes a pitch's trajectory and comes up with a predicted point of contact. There is science about this out there. If the brain overestimates the speed of a pitch the bat will be early and also, very importantly, swing over the ball. If it underestimates the speed the bat will be late and swing under the ball. So, to take advantage of this, generally speaking, slower pitches should be down in the zone and faster ones up in the zone. The science has also shown that changes in velocity are more effective than changes in location when it comes to fooling hitters and limiting contact.
I don’t know if this is helpful but we use the Chinese jump rope to work on the drop ball.
In a perfect world you are correct, it is considered a crappy rise.I am puzzled by your perspective on this topic. You have proven (to me anyways) to be quite savvy and knowledgeable in regards to pitching. I am very new compared to you(and Bill) but I cant help but think that A bullet spin pitch is either a crappy rise or a crappy drop. It doesnt achieve any of the deception you cite here.(predicted point of contact).
In a perfect world you are correct, it is considered a crappy rise.
Why is a 'drop' effective, because it moves downward more than the brain expects, but in comparison to what? What is the brain expecting, a 6-12 fastball (isn't that a drop?), NO, not if it doesn't go down or your not wanting it to go down on purpose (which I don't understand). a bullet spin fastball, something in between? More and more god hitters are being trained to identify spin of the ball, bullet spin gives them a great chance to see that very thing. Plus, bullet spin guarantees the ball isn't going to move so, again, I don't understand the purpose. Teaching someone bullet spin in lieu of 6/12 spin will make the necessary dropball spin even harder to learn. Once the muscle memory of twisting the wrist comes into play, it's hard to break. I truly believe this is why and how the "turn over drop" got started. Some coaches didn't know how to correct bullet spin so they started a drop like this. Yes, this can produce topspin and make the ball go down but, I'm not a fan of the mechanical changes necessary to throw a "turn over drop" instead of a regular one. But that's me. If a pitcher throws 6-12 spin all the time the brain will adapt and a flat fastball becomes the unexpected pitch. Really? You wanna throw a pitch that you "hope" they let go? Yes, absolutely you can get away with this and it might work once in a while on that "unexpected" thing but that is a pitching version of Russian Roulette. Also, in the real world there i s video of pitcher after pitcher throwing a bullet spin 'crappy rise'. I won't bother to link to the Rachel Garcia video that has been posted here numerous times. This is up for debate but, I still think Garcia's effectiveness isn't because of movement on her pitches, because anything not spinning correctly has no chance to move properly. I believe she gets away with a lot because she throws 70+ mph. Not many others do that in women's fastpitch. I think she keeps the ball low which makes ANYTHING up in the zone 10x more tempting to the hitter. Playing a guessing game at the plate with someone who can blow it past you is a dangerous thing to do as a hitter. Bill won't be happy with me but on occasion I have taught bullet spin, as an alternative, to a pitcher that throws exclusively 6-12. In a perfect world I agree it's top spin, back spin, change up, and maybe some side spin.
A question for the dad's who's daughter's throw a drop, does she throw a fastball, if so how does it spin?
A question for the dad's who's daughter's throw a drop, does she throw a fastball, if so how does it spin?
A good to great 12-6 drop should be in the high teens to 22 for rps and that is the same for a 12-6 fastball. If the fastball has more of a bullet spin then the number would be more in the mid to high twenties rps. The higher the rps the more likely it is closer to bullet than 12-6. As long as form is not neglected and there is good whip in the arm then the wrist action can be increased to impart more spin. The tighter the rotation the more the ball will moveWhat's the correlation b/w spin rate and drop? i.e. - 40 mph / 50 mph pitch, how much more does the ball drop for each X increase in spin? Is this "chartable"? 2000 rpm over 40' = x inches, vs. 2400 rpm. I'm guessing on the rpms - I don't have that chart that was posted a few weeks ago up in front of me that showed TB/HS/D1 spin rates, so I'm not sure what the actual difference in rpm is b/w a FB and DB.
Maybe there's too many variables? I would expect there to be a difference (in height change) when comparing a bullet spin FB to a 12-6 DB, but is it also significant b/w a 12-6 FB and a 12-6 DB? Is the "contortion" to get the extra (100/200/300?) rpm worth it?