- Feb 3, 2011
- 1,880
- 48
10u, 61 girls registered (with late registration still available another few weeks)
Agent says 5 teams of 12 (one with 13) is best, because of injuries and absenteeism. President agrees and says schedule can be rounded out with double-headers.
Two of the coaches would rather go 6 teams of 10 each, knowing that several teams will end up with 11 by the time we get to the drop-dead date. One of the coaches has no preference either way, and I'm not sure about the other coach. Scheduling logistics aside, I lean more towards the smaller rosters allowing for greater participation. I also think we'd see less absences if girls knew they were going to play more innings. But, I will support the league decision if 5 is the number. One potential downside of 5 is that we'd be capped at 65 girls, as no coach is willing to go with a roster of 14.
The president did say, however, that if necessary, we could split the one set of coaches, but if that's going to be done, I would think we'd want to have that sorted out before the draft tomorrow.
Am I looking at this the wrong way? And if you were coaching this age, would you rather have 12 to work with or just 10, but a completely balanced schedule...and an easier substitution matrix to manage?
Agent says 5 teams of 12 (one with 13) is best, because of injuries and absenteeism. President agrees and says schedule can be rounded out with double-headers.
Two of the coaches would rather go 6 teams of 10 each, knowing that several teams will end up with 11 by the time we get to the drop-dead date. One of the coaches has no preference either way, and I'm not sure about the other coach. Scheduling logistics aside, I lean more towards the smaller rosters allowing for greater participation. I also think we'd see less absences if girls knew they were going to play more innings. But, I will support the league decision if 5 is the number. One potential downside of 5 is that we'd be capped at 65 girls, as no coach is willing to go with a roster of 14.
The president did say, however, that if necessary, we could split the one set of coaches, but if that's going to be done, I would think we'd want to have that sorted out before the draft tomorrow.
Am I looking at this the wrong way? And if you were coaching this age, would you rather have 12 to work with or just 10, but a completely balanced schedule...and an easier substitution matrix to manage?