1. The umpire clearly signals the runner was safe.
2. I would have called the runner out simply because she didn't slide! (so as not to reward the bad behavior!!)
There is no rule supporting this call.
1. The umpire clearly signals the runner was safe.
2. I would have called the runner out simply because she didn't slide! (so as not to reward the bad behavior!!)
Yea, I know. That's why I qualified it the way I did.There is no rule supporting this call.
No out is needed in a fielder's choiceI'm confused. If both runners are safe, then how is it a FC? I can see the question being a hit or an error, but I've always thought an FC required an out.
I'm confused. If both runners are safe, then how is it a FC? I can see the question being a hit or an error, but I've always thought an FC required an out.
Correct. The fiielder chose not to get you out and instead attempted to get another outNo out is needed in a fielder's choice
I posted the Kinsler video. That was scored a FCI'm confused. If both runners are safe, then how is it a FC? I can see the question being a hit or an error, but I've always thought an FC required an out.
Found a definition.I'm confused. If both runners are safe, then how is it a FC? I can see the question being a hit or an error, but I've always thought an FC required an out.
Who said they were?...Mental errors are not errors either