- Mar 15, 2011
- 38
- 6
In my experience there are two types of parent-coaches. The first is someone who love the game, is good at coaching and one way or another ended up coaching his DD's team. The second type is one who volunteers as an "assistant" with the sole intent on using that position to get his DD more playing time.
The bottom line (IMHO) is that the proper thing to do is to give the coaches kid a nod when the talent is close, but I've seen too many times where parental involvement screws over a much better player in favor of the volunteers DD. In the end EVERYONE gets a raw deal because of the train wreck at F4. You can't win consistently by giving the opponents 4+ outs in an inning.
On a related note, I think you can tell a lot about a team by watching F4. This is the position where the DD that is starting because her parent is a coach usually gets put when she is undeserving. It seems that every time I've witnessed a disaster at F4 it turned out to be a DD of one of the coaches.
My opinion anyway, and I am the world's foremost expert on my own opinion.
The bottom line (IMHO) is that the proper thing to do is to give the coaches kid a nod when the talent is close, but I've seen too many times where parental involvement screws over a much better player in favor of the volunteers DD. In the end EVERYONE gets a raw deal because of the train wreck at F4. You can't win consistently by giving the opponents 4+ outs in an inning.
On a related note, I think you can tell a lot about a team by watching F4. This is the position where the DD that is starting because her parent is a coach usually gets put when she is undeserving. It seems that every time I've witnessed a disaster at F4 it turned out to be a DD of one of the coaches.
My opinion anyway, and I am the world's foremost expert on my own opinion.