Thanks FPMark, I will try to find one. I do believe that this is the reasons.
This is from Dr. Russell at Kettering "For the stiff bat, the frequency of the first bending mode is right in the middle of the most sensitive frequency range, while the second bending mode is at a much higher frequency. If the frequency of the first bending mode has the greatest influence on the perception of sting, then a flexible bat should feel better for impacts away from the sweet spot. However, if it is the second bending mode that most influences the perception of sting, then the stiff bat would cause less pain in the hands of the batter."
The chart provided show the flexible bat to have a second mode (afects top hand) right at the top of the senstive frequencies. Sorry about the geek stuff.
Geek stuff is okay...as long as I can understand it... . Is he giving a fact of how a stiff bat reacts, and listing two different possibilities for a flexable bat? I ask because of the use of 'if' in regards to flex. bat.
I was thinking in terms of the handle being more or less isolated from the barrel by the flexable shaft absorbing the sting frequencies that start in the barrel. Sort of like electronics being mounted on rubber to isolate them from harmful frequencies in harsh enviroments. The frequency that causes sting/harm being reduced to more of a slower, harmless vibration, or the flexing back and forth fealing I mentioned earlier.