- Nov 29, 2009
- 2,981
- 83
The team is intact. The player uniforms were purchased with player fees. The team equipment was purchased with player fees. The organization is claiming that the equipment is a contribution to and therefore belongs to the organization, not to the team.
It sounds like the organization is doing what every one that I've been involved with does. Uniforms, bat bags, spirit wear and such belongs to the players. Each year there is team equipment such as nets, wiffle balls, game balls, practice balls and various other things the team needs to practice/play with which needs to be added, repaired or replaced. Experienced organizations figure that amount into the team budget. That "team" equipment stays with the organization. If the same coach stays with an organization it may look like the coach is "keeping" the equipment. When, in fact, he is holding it for the start of the next season. If the coach leaves the organization the equipment is supposed to be returned to the organization.
It sounds like the organization used the wrong term with parents. Instead of using the word "donated" they should have stated "team equipment maintenance" or something like that.
As others have stated. I think you're chasing the wrong rabbit here. $100 per player sounds a little high. I used to figure $500 for the team for the year. Most of the times I came real close to spending it. Like everything else the price of equipment is going up each year.