Thank you for creating and articulating my position and then disagreeing with it. I appreciate it when someone who lets the media do their thinking for them, do it for me. Its so much faster then having to have my own thought.
Stranger danger lessons were among the worst safety programs ever designed for kids. It created this image of a bogey man who will snatch up kids and created this false sense of comfort around people the kids know. Statistically the child predator is more likely someone the child knows, but the kid isn't trained to recognize danger from people they know, only that strangers are bad.
As for the melding of topics. I certainly don't see how an organization that charges thousands a year is more or less safe then one who gets substantially the same thing done for hundreds of dollars.
It is true that people with low IQ's breed 12x faster then people with high IQ's, and that people tend to breed with like IQ partners. We'll probably see two distinct species in a few hundred years.
-W
Comedian Doug Stanhope on this topic-
"--snipped the sick BS--"
Why would you assume that has any place here?
Sorry, Joe, no desire to offend here. I deleted the post. But to answer your question, Whenever this topic comes up, this bit by this comedian pops to mind. I heard it a few years ago when my DDs were really young and I was way too overprotective and it made me laugh at myself because I was so concerned about something that is highly unlikely to happen. I forget sometimes that some people get offended when it comes to comedians that work with taboo subjects like this so I apologize.