I guess my eyes aren't so keen, I see the scap being intentionally brought into play in this swing. I see it working in conjunction with other muscles in the torso preventing the upper body from leaking forward until "go time". I don't see the scap as a reaction in this swing, I see it as an active player.
I'm not saying you are wrong W=w, it's just simply what my eyes see.... and would love to hear your thoughts on what makes the scap work it's way back like we see in that swing
Agree, you want the movements to be a reaction not an action.. Movements that happen as a reaction allows for the continuous flow, which makes the swing adjustable.. If your focused on pulling something back the hands may get stuck. Once the sequence starts it needs to be one continuous move..
Thanks, every reaction needs an action. What I see as an action most certainly could be a reaction. I'm not an expert that's for sure. In this case I would like to know what action causes the scap to retract/pinch.
There it is.
I see a subtle scapular retract("i'm not an anatomy expert either ), I don't know
Julray,
You want some loading/stretching or whatever you want to call it around the body and not just straight back toward the catcher. That is why you had to correct your daughter. I have no problems with scap loading or pulling back, although like anything a little goes a long ways. It is easy to over do it.