I agree with this and I think my daughter does too.I read this type of change as "simplify". reduce the moving parts making it easier to stay in sync. Increase repeatability and consistency.
I agree with this and I think my daughter does too.I read this type of change as "simplify". reduce the moving parts making it easier to stay in sync. Increase repeatability and consistency.
What I am saying is the best programs recruit players that are talented at their craft, hitting or pitching and let them use the mechanics that got them there. Think Oklahoma.Tweak here or there or trying something a little different is ok BUT to completely overhaul someone mechanics into a one size fits all approach could/would be detrimental to the players and probably the program.? Are you saying you want coaches to just be managers?
Technical position has its own technical pitching coach.
?Are you saying get rid of that?
View attachment 30025
what about all the hitting instruction feedback from college coaches, what say you on that?
But some girls got there despite poor mechanics. Maybe the athletic ability or power helped them reach their level, but it would be foolish of a coach not to correct a flaw he or she sees in a girl that might make them even better.What I am saying is the best programs recruit players that are talented at their craft, hitting or pitching and let them use the mechanics that got them there. Think Oklahoma.Tweak here or there or trying something a little different is ok BUT to completely overhaul someone mechanics into a one size fits all approach could/would be detrimental to the players and probably the program.
I agree with your premise, just not sure if I'm completely sold on the idea that removing the negative motion will result in a tangible positive outcome. Generally if you aren't engaged in an activity that deals with an outside stimulus on when to start (e.g. starting gun) I'm not sure why you would want to discount momentum. I know "the foot doctor" has thoughts on this.I read this type of change as "simplify". reduce the moving parts making it easier to stay in sync. Increase repeatability and consistency.
Agree, but in my opinion, you need an accepted consensus on what constitutes a flaw.But some girls got there despite poor mechanics. Maybe the athletic ability or power helped them reach their level, but it would be foolish of a coach not to correct a flaw he or she sees in a girl that might make them even better.
That is something you will never get. Heck, some people still teach Hello Elbow!!!Agree, but in my opinion, you need an accepted consensus on what constitutes a flaw.
Now I want to hear what the pitching instructors think of the OP post.
Yeah but those college coaches already know more about pitching than you will ever know.For me it would be a collaborative effort: "What do you like about what you're currently doing?" "Have you ever tried _____?" "How did it feel?" "What do you think about _____?"
It is really heart breaking to hear the horror stories from college players. Pitchers running for several miles to get stronger. Need to have 7 pitches by spring. Totally changing all the spins they had success with until they're almost all bullet spin when they return for summer. Mandatory 20 minute long warm up with swinging the Xelerator, wrist snaps, K's at 90 with static legs, pitching from one knee, storks, walkthroughs, warming up all 7 spins from wrist snaps and moving back to full. All leaving little time to work full pitches to the catcher and feeling out of their groove. Did I mention some crazy pitch calling?
I dread those calls, texts, vacation visit updates and summer rebuilds...