round and round we go
I think it’s mobility based. Bonds is really early. My kid not so much.
Swinging down
- Thread starter Shawn
- Start date
Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch
Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.
round and round we go
I think it’s mobility based. Bonds is really early. My kid not so much.
- Jun 8, 2016
- 16,118
- 113
I know a kid who never gets there
Your measurement points are also wildly different, which makes this comparison significantly flawed.
- Jun 8, 2016
- 16,118
- 113
Is Rich even 6 ft tall?
are you saying the swings match? No, right?
Just shy of 12 ft if you count his ego…….. he’s probably right at 6
Attachments
I'm not making a judgement about whether TM's swing matches Bonds. Honestly, I don't care if they do or don't. I'm only pointing out that the measurement standards being used to claim differences are so inconsistent as to render the comparison based on measurements to be useless.
@clemenslee1
I think you could do the Bonds hitch as well for feel. It just needs to happen in order. Back leg stability then hands working down. The body should move forward as the hands drop all the way down. Have intent w the knee.. release in the same order.. back knee then hands.
The hands just gotta be working away while the hips get forward. That tightens the knee.
I think you could do the Bonds hitch as well for feel. It just needs to happen in order. Back leg stability then hands working down. The body should move forward as the hands drop all the way down. Have intent w the knee.. release in the same order.. back knee then hands.
The hands just gotta be working away while the hips get forward. That tightens the knee.
