Go back and watch the Joe Rogan podcast with Riley Gains. Pretty compelling and her parents have to be super proud of the way she handles herself. Well spoken and well beyond her years.
You might want to read the scientific articles. There is no proof *YET* that there is an advantage. There may be proof in the future, but not today.
Implications of gender-affirming endocrine care for sports participation
Many transgender (trans) individuals utilize gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) to promote changes in secondary sex characteristics to affirm their gender. Participation rates of trans people in sport are exceedingly low, yet given high rates of ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This is my feeling as well.I appreciate this thread being allowed to continue. It is complicated, and I am interested to hear how people can think it is fair to allow trans women to compete against cisgender women. I have a hard time seeing it, myself. One reason it is complicated is that people transition at different times of their lives, notably before and after puberty. People going through puberty male get obvious height advantages, other advantages are harder to quantify. If someone gets all the height advantages of being male during puberty, no amount of hormone therapy changes that. I think the new Olympics rule is that you must have transitioned prior to twelve to be allowed to compete.
I think the NAIA rule is a step in the right direction. I don't want to exclude anyone from sports, but cisgender women deserve a place to compete against each other. If it isn't a fair competition, that is not a chance to compete. After we all seem to have agreed that it made sense to have mens' and womens' categories of competition so that women had a chance to compete against genetically similar competitors, it can't be fair to allow athletes to compete with cisgender females when they have some of the genetics advantages that come from being born male.
How absurd has this gotten? Has anyone noticed Game Changer no longer refers to softball players as "she" in the write-up? Now it says "they" instead. My daughter is a singular female, not a they...
save your ghost in the sky words for someone else
The article actually provides proof of an advantage.You might want to read the scientific articles. There is no proof *YET* that there is an advantage. There may be proof in the future, but not today.
Implications of gender-affirming endocrine care for sports participation
Many transgender (trans) individuals utilize gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) to promote changes in secondary sex characteristics to affirm their gender. Participation rates of trans people in sport are exceedingly low, yet given high rates of ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov