- May 27, 2013
- 2,573
- 113
So then are coaches attending showcases to see games a waste of time?
So then are coaches attending showcases to see games a waste of time?
Just sounds like a broken system then. I would think a coach would want to see a player do what they could be doing for the school if they get recruited. I’ll have to pass the word along to my college coach friends. Maybe it will help to improve their recruiting experiences, as well if this is the general consensus that games are pretty much a waste of time.Mostly yes. It is generally why a coach prefers to see you in a camp setting. Except for specific positions, you may only get a few chances to show ability in a showcase game. Half the time at those events they are evaluating how a player interacts with coaches, teammates and how the family is.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just sounds like a broken system then. I would think a coach would want to see a player do what they are going to be doing for the school if they get recruited.
You might have seen it before but I always found this video of Patty Gasso fascinating. Not easy on coaches to decide sometimes also. She gives a pretty candid answer about stuff she looks at. The physical abilities have to be there but at showcases and other stuff they are evaluating the other stuff just as much if not more.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Young growing up in an environment where others are telling them what to do.This has nothing to do with front toss but does relate to camp and scrimmaging.
My daughter attended a camp at the beginning of the summer. During the scrimmage, there were plays made by some girls. It was obvious they were good fielders. What was also obvious is they had ZERO, softball IQ.
The college coaches and college players were there observing. There was no coach yelling for, for example, the player to throw the ball to 2B or to "eat it" like I see during so many actual tournament games. There were no 1B or 3B coaches telling the girls to run or not to run and some kids, seriously, didn't have the first clue.
It was actually quite sad to see 15, 16, 17 year old girls, have some skills, not actually have any idea how to play the game without being constantly told what to do.
Yes! This!!!This has nothing to do with front toss but does relate to camp and scrimmaging.
My daughter attended a camp at the beginning of the summer. During the scrimmage, there were plays made by some girls. It was obvious they were good fielders. What was also obvious is they had ZERO, softball IQ.
The college coaches and college players were there observing. There was no coach yelling for, for example, the player to throw the ball to 2B or to "eat it" like I see during so many actual tournament games. There were no 1B or 3B coaches telling the girls to run or not to run and some kids, seriously, didn't have the first clue.
It was actually quite sad to see 15, 16, 17 year old girls, have some skills, not actually have any idea how to play the game without being constantly told what to do.
#1 biggest change I see in softball is the giant mixture of talent levels now.What was also obvious is they had ZERO, softball IQ.
NCAA rules do not allow college coaches to hold invite-only camps. NCAA bylaws state that institutional camps and clinics must be open to all entrants, with limitations based on age, grade, gender, and number. All camp and clinic advertisements must include language that states the camp is open to all entrants.#1 biggest change I see in softball is the giant mixture of talent levels now.
Seeing tournaments be like that is another indicator of the same predicament.
Camps (if they are not invite only) are providing a camp for a much much broader range of players.