I'm referring to Falby's catch/no catch earlier in the game. It was reviewed and it was obvious she did not catch the ball based on the review. She knew it as well. The ruling on the field was a catch and after much discussion the powers that be sent in the ruling that a catch is not a "reviewable" play and it could NOT be reversed due to them not knowing how to place the runners if it was changed. I don't have the clip (it was before the in the park HR off the fence) but I'm sure if someone searched they could find it.Okay I will ask
Why would that need to be reviewed or why would that be in consideration of being reviewed?