My previous post was based on which SoCal teams appeared on the list, not how many. This list is a definite improvement as all the finalists in the Southern Section Div-I and Div-II championships appear on it (i.e. Pacifica, King, Mission Viejo and Chino).All I’ve done is take what people have submitted, with absolutely no judgments. If the SoCal “big fish” don’t post the numbers, that’s one thing. But if their number don’t match up with some of the others, maybe they’re not such big fish after all.
So, you're suggesting the SF Giants and Oakland A's MLB teams aren't better than their minor league teams "if their number don't match up" (sic). LOL
I did the same thing for baseball, and the same kind of comments were made, as though I was trying to provide some kind of national ranking system, which I’m absolutely not trying to do. But what I’ve done is the basis for any ranking system. The best ones also factor in other things like strength of schedule, but I don’t even want to get into that mess.
LOL What credible ranking system uses points/runs scored per game as the pimary criterion?
But back to your statement about big fish and ponds, what difference does it make? Why denigrate a team for the conference/league/division they play in? Is the best team in the weakest division not still worthy of praise? I’m pretty sure there’s 8 divisions in Ca because it wouldn’t be very smart or much fun for either team for a DVII school to play a bunch of DI schools.
Hmm, you recognize the level of competition is different, but not what difference it makes?
When you find a way for EVERY team to play EVERY other team to determine which is the best team, let me know. Until then, all anyone can do is work with what’s available.
Being limited by what's available and trying to pass off a horribly flawed methodology as meaningful are two totally different things.
I was gonna generate an attachment that only shows Ca teams that played more than 20 games and scored more than 10 RPG. Maybe it would make you feel more proud since there’s all kinds of SoCal teams on it. But chances are, the truth is most of the teams that play very difficult schedules aren’t scoring a lot of runs, so instead I ran it to pull Ca teams that played more than 25 games and had a WPct of over .800. View attachment 6406