- Jun 8, 2016
- 16,107
- 113
Haha..Riley thought he was going to have an easy path to the college football playoffs in the PAC 12..
Well USC football and UCLA basketball, but yes, it is about the revenue positive sports, also explains the timing, 2024 is when the current PAC-12 tv deal expires.These moves are ALWAYS about the money. And always about football.
These moves are 99% about football, and 100% about the money side of football.
Ca. may want to create another lane on the freeway and off road ramp for UCLA...All about the TV money period!! Why should USC and UCLA get $30M a year from the PAC-12 when they could get $75M a year from the Big10?
The extra money should be able to cover travel cost and then some.
Get ready for a LOT of BIG 10 Teams playing at UCLA in Feb and Mar.
We took a driving tour of Pepperdine during the spring. Breathtaking views. My HS buddy's son played ball at Pepperdine for several years then transferred to Mizz then South Carolina.Pepperdine doesn't have varsity softball either. 3 of the top 5 school's on my DD's interest list don't have varsity softball
Kirk Herbstreit (SEC today commentator) speculates that the top colleges might end up like MLB - two big leagues with 3-4 divisions in each league. Seems like the athletes at this level will be looking at even more travel than is already the case.
The wrinkle in the scheme is that NCAA football and basketball is reconstructing itself like pro-sports, but they don't have a draft which helps even out the talent across teams. The draft is imperfect, of course, but I don't see how they will maintain any semblance of balance in this brave new world of college sports. And yes, I am aware that the imbalances are pretty significant now.Nah, they'll end up with less travel because the conferences will set up regional divisions. It will be back to how it used to be with regional conferences. The Big Ten will have the northern half of the country and the SEC the southern half, and they'll each have 3 or 4 divisions set up regionally.