- Feb 3, 2011
- 1,880
- 48
Although the team worked very hard to earn its qualification, the majority of parents voted to decline the bid to Nationals. I'm not sure why there was no group discussion (just asking the question out loud here, don't get mad at me anyone), but the secret email vote went against the trip, so our meeting ended up being about making plans for Westerns instead.....and of course did you guys end up qualifying?
Once our parents passed, the 3rd-place team immediately jumped on and accepted the bid.
One of the sentiments expressed was that the team wouldn't be competitive enough to get deep in bracket play and might very well be 4-and-done. The other major concern was the travel cost. Both are very valid, rational reasons to opt for the smaller event.
What I didn't agree with, though, was a statement by a parent that it was 'easy' to qualify, so the team should have no trouble repeating their feat in the future. Nothing could be further from the truth. ASA Nationals had not been on the radar for this team at the start of the season, which was why there was no ongoing fundraising with that huge expense looming on the horizon. What's done is done, but I think it's a mistake to take for granted that they'll be able to qualify again in 2 years from now.
I know the girls will have fun in Oregon and some of the teams expected to make the trip are teams they've beaten, assuming those teams are totally intact. Many teams are in the process of upgrading with pickup players, of course, so it'll be interesting to see how our girls fare against them now as our team has no personnel changes planned.
As a semi-crazy softball dad, though, I confess it's hard seeing them miss out on what I perceive to be a bigger opportunity. Some of the teams going to Kentucky are also teams they've beaten or competed well against. But, by opting for Westerns, they'll be playing against other teams that are closer to their level overall and if that gives them the opportunity to get more games and make a deep run, then I'm fully onboard with the decision. Plus, it goes without saying that a 6-hour road trip is a lot less expensive than a cross-country flight, so it's tough to argue with the economics of playing closer to home.
We'll see how it goes.