Fair...I was thinking about the team but given the prevalence and importance of stats that wouldn't work. A step up could be a base runner that would count as an unearned run...or maybe the coach has to sing "killing me softly" to the crowd between innings.
I'm genuinely looking for someone with a rationale on obstruction. You think she set up in the running lane without being pulled their by the ball? Old rules I can see obstruction if called really aggressively (barely). New rules I just can't.
There is no way to make the plays (particularly at home) perfectly safe without ruining them. I think the current rule is fine if just not applied so inconsistently and in the Stanford case erroneously. We have to remember we came from runners intentionally mowing down catchers...much safer now.
I don't need to pay $45 and watch a webinar to confirm a bad call 😇. In what world is this obstruction and the play in the OU Texas game is not? That play was much more egregious (and to be clear I think the umps got that one right by not calling it).
And another thing is that the industry collusion on a $400 bat is an equity issue for the sport and kids that can't afford them. Not Eastons fault alone but sad nonetheless.
I'm chuckling at the absurdity of a thread about how to baby a bat and the fact that every serious softball player I know with a ghost has two because one has broken. I maintain my speculation that Easton intentionally makes bats that break to sell two at a time to one player and because it...
Lock the thread. Nobody is going to change their opinion or learn about the issue in a unique way here but comaraderie over the common love of softball may be lost in the political shuffle.
I haven't seen this girl but I have seen elite 16U and 18U teams get very frustrated against slow super spinny pitchers that can mix and spot while hammering fast pitchers with fewer tools.